Imagine — just imagine — directing pandemic relief funds preferentially based on skin tone. In 2020. Unreal.
Show this thread
The only real question here is how San Francisco intends to structure this to get around the fact that offering financial services on the basis of race is incredibly fucking illegal.https://twitter.com/LondonBreed/status/1274058443809107969 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They probably like their odds in the 9th circuit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ah, but they aren't discriminating against applicants, they are eucriminating for applicants based on race. ("I'm not surcharging you; I just raised the prices and not giving you the discount I give everyone else.")
End of conversation
-
-
-
How confident are we in the judgments of SCOTUS right now?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They know that DOJ lawyers apply discrimination laws as a one-way street, even in the Trump administration. They will never have a case brought against them, just like every other one of these situations in the coming years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Language manipulation is everything. It never matters what the law actually is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's only illegal if a judge says so. I'm guessing that on current trends courts soon won't have a problem with cities offering preferable financing for historically discriminated against races.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right, we're talking strict scrutiny here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.