Imagine — just imagine — directing pandemic relief funds preferentially based on skin tone. In 2020. Unreal.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"All of us are equal..but some of us are more equal than others."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the law draws a distinction between a person who is themselves a minority and a "person" which is in fact a corporation with 51% minority ownership.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They probably like their odds in the 9th circuit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Language manipulation is everything. It never matters what the law actually is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The loan fund should be designed to benefit businesses solely in proportion to the hit they have taken, rather than by the race of their owners. That keeps it legal while providing equivalent results.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah, but they aren't discriminating against applicants, they are eucriminating for applicants based on race. ("I'm not surcharging you; I just raised the prices and not giving you the discount I give everyone else.")
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They know that DOJ lawyers apply discrimination laws as a one-way street, even in the Trump administration. They will never have a case brought against them, just like every other one of these situations in the coming years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right, we're talking strict scrutiny here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.