Of all the functions local government has, protecting the lives and property of residents seems like a pretty decent #1 priority to have. I'm an Oakland resident. We have a serious crime problem here. Ask my neighbors whether they think we should reduce the police budget.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @auderdy
Leave aside budget reductions for the moment. In the most recent stats I could find, Oakland police are making over 30,000 discretionary stops a year (mostly traffic). https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/beta.oaklandca.gov/2016-2017-SD-Report-Final.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But out of 1,228 felony assaults, only 690 were even assigned to an investigator, and only 55 resulted in a charge!https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5691907-Oakland-Police-Department-Annual-Report-2017.html#document/p54/a477046 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So it seems like y'all are paying a huge portion of the city budget for tens of thousands of traffic stops, while violent crime goes almost entirely unsolved.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stuartbuck1 @auderdy
It's complicated. For one thing, traffic tickets bolster the budget (not a good incentive, there). For another, the entirety of the East Bay has become less tolerant of poor driving, traffic deaths and even *cars in general* since gentrifying.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @auderdy
Check out staffing: Robberies/burglaries: 10 officers. Few cases solved. Felony assaults: 5 investigators. Few cases solved. Patrol officers across 5 areas: 379 officers. Lots of traffic tickets! Agreed it's simplistic, but why can't they reallocate and save resources here....
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stuartbuck1 @auderdy
I would prefer to see more beat cops than traffic cops, but again, it's more complicated than that. I tend to agree with community advocates who think beats are essential; cops out on the streets and sidewalks can intervene in crime rather than just respond to it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There are cops who occasionally roll through my neighborhood, which isn't the worst of East Oakland but is definitely high crime. No idea whether they're classified as traffic cops or something else, but I'm glad they're there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @auderdy
Fair points. It just feels like the divisions that solve violent crimes are massively understaffed, and they have the success rate to prove it (i.e., close to zero).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @stuartbuck1 @auderdy
Violent crime mostly goes unsolved everywhere in the United States and, indeed, the world. It's very hard to solve these crimes. Community advocates are right that prevention/intervention need to be prioritized, but that means cops *on the streets.*
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
...and surveillance, and of course community programs. But frankly a lot of early interventions work in part because they can be and are court-ordered. A lot of people wind up on a better path because it's that or jail.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.