You're kidding, right? How do you give that kid legit instruction in any subject: foreign language? An art class? Orchestra, band, chorus? You gonno to teach that kid guitar/piano for that? There's a lot more to a well-rounded education than you can do online. GTFO w/that!
I think it's a bit extraordinary to think kids taught directly in a group of 5 by a PhD student or professor are doomed to become useless in comparison to anyone with a public K-12 education, especially given Bloom's 2 sigma problem and other related research. Worth testing, no?
-
-
If I had to guess, I'd assume <10% of children who played in the school band and took a few years of a language have anything even remotely resembling a basic capacity for those things 10 years later. And again, could pick them back up without school if they liked.
-
A kid who loves French will probably speak French, a kid who loves bass will probably play bass. Most kids are not doing what they love in school. For those who do, it may be a good place for them, though of course they could learn what they love more effectively with tutoring.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's a big jump from "tutor" to "PhD/professor." And no "uselessness" was being implied on my part. You know what my kid's miss the most? Being with others, in real space/time. A tutor can't replicate that. Even homeschooling can't always (co-ops are a start).
-
Also worth pointing out that that $100K tutor can only be hired by families with means. Best way to exacerbate achievement gap.
Unless that's meant to be a feature, not a bug. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
