We have to get real, here. If SF doesn't effectively cooperate with the surrounding region to manage the safety + needs of the homeless in a more homogenous & sustainable manner, people will continue to travel to wherever the most generous services are; it's the smart thing to do
-
-
Don’t fall for the mayor’s latest distraction. There is a database of people the city manages. Don’t be fearful that flocks of new arrivals are coming for rooms. The rooms are being offered to people in the city’s database only. She is creating new distractions everyday - ask why
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
I mean I and many others don't know that they're looking at the database. If I was homeless might as well move to San Francisco since they're offering services and you'll get something anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
People don’t pick up and move to a city where they don’t know anyone during a pandemic. This whole “fear” is concocted for a reason. Show me the data of people flocking here otherwise be wary of the politicians that stoke these fears. It’s a familiar playbook to score points
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I can anecdotally see way more camps and homeless around. It's not fair to them to invite them to a place which cannot support them. Let's wait until there's data.
@EskSF,@hknightsf,@TheMarinaTimes should look into it1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @SuperPACman_ @christinevans and
The specter of homeless people flocking to SF like the Joad family has been bandied about for decades. Far from giving everyone a room, the number of homeless people living on the street who've been given a room is extremely low. Even sick SRO residents aren't getting rooms.
2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @EskSF @SuperPACman_ and
https://missionlocal.org/2020/04/the-next-sro-outbreak-could-already-be-happening/ … The city isn't letting randos into rooms. These are identified populations and individuals. The notion that a caravan of bums will beat a path here due to our misplaced generosity is an old trope. Our City economist couldn't find documentation for it.pic.twitter.com/0ClAeTCXib
2 replies 5 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @EskSF @christinevans and
How does that explain anecdotal increases in homeless encampments in GG park and around city hall?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SuperPACman_ @EskSF and
Perhaps the point is about optics. Misinformation is rampant now and this is enough to move to SF if you've got nothing going for you in your hometown.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SuperPACman_ @christinevans and
I agree with you on that. But I've been hearing this for a while — not as a warning to would-be homeless interlopers but as an excuse as to why we couldn't move forward with hotels.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Here's my concern. When you say: "I've been hearing this for a while — not as a warning to would-be homeless interlopers but as an excuse as to why we couldn't move forward with hotels." What I'm hearing is that some facts fit frames that don't support your policy preferences.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @EskSF and
I'm in favor of mobilizing resources to prevent homeless people from winding up in situations where it's virtually impossible for them to get their needs met & be safe from the virus. Hotels can have a big role there. But we need to be utterly neutral on the facts on the ground.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @EskSF and
Now, maybe the mayor and fire chief are lying about the apparent migration issue. Why would they? Beats me. It sure doesn't make them look good or reduce the demand for their resources. But if you believe they're lying, say so, and explain why. "Tropes" are tropes for a reason.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.