The phenomenon of science being tainted with politics, and politics tainted with scientism, has been growing for decades. The way it has been playing out in the pandemic is not an especially severe instance.
-
-
-
We need to be ever so vigilant, the stakes are too high.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is quite important, but I don't think the way this article is framed is how you get all of society to buy in. There are lots of more "mainstream" scientists who are derided just as much or even more like Fauci or Drosten. It's not really a question of dissent from a certain
-
point of view, but a question of fundamentally tolerating different opinions, no matter whether they are more "mainstream" or not.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/26/virologist-christian-drosten-germany-coronavirus-expert-interview …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
doing science and doing politics has one common aspect: both overpromise and both underdeliver. It happens constantly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, you’re saying that (insert axe to grind) isn’t automatically correct just because I can produce a compelling chart based off of an incomplete picture?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good science and good politics play out through argument and explanations. Not by suppressing criticism and alternative ideas. Both scientific theories and social policies need to stand-up to the empirical reality of the world. A hazard arises from misunderstanding this process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.