Surely the Chinese communist party would never LIE
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t think it falls into conspiracy theory territory, and it should absolutely be pursued as a line of inquiry. I personally take issue with jumping to it as a likely conclusion as some have. As you imply finding out one way or the other will be difficult thanks to China.
-
I don't see a good reason to think it's considerably more or less likely than the wet market hypothesis; early media coverage seemed to imply they'd found SARS-CoV-2 in the pangolins, but at my last check that wasn't the case
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Intentionally: very, very, very low. Probability of an unintentional release falls within the same order of magnitude as an organic animal-to-human transmission at a wet market, but with foreign journalists and investigators barred it's unlikely we'll know any time soon
- 5 more replies
-
-
-
Yes! Anyone who claims with certainty that this was the case is on unsound footing. But it is entirely plausible, and the case is frankly enhanced by the CCP's suppression of research into the true origin.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Couldn't put it better. Still a not obvious conclusion. But it's absurd to disregard that possibility
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have no educated opinion yet, but it strikes me as quite odd that there hasn’t been more mainstream discussion of the fact that the lab is ~900 feet from the wet market where we know the first human transmission happened.
-
Of course the market is 0 feet away from the wet market = infinitely closer
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.