This is another really, really bad meme. It's an excuse for people to never confront the reasons they enjoy or desire low status or low social value activities, offered at the cost of calling themselves, their friends and their children stupid.
I can imagine plenty of cases where the latter is "worse" on my terms than the former, the former "worse" than the latter, and neither/both worth the time. Rather than go neurotic over it, I do what I want to do within semi-reasonable bounds for health, safety & sustainability.
-
-
Yes, you're right. The problem parents face is how to keep their kids within those bounds. To maintain that it will just happen comes with a burden of proof, I think. But it sounds like we're in rough agreement on that
-
Parents regularly fail to keep their children within those bounds while excluding nearly all of their options for pursuing enjoyment. Case in point: the sheer number who literally give their prepubescent children amphetamines because a school administrator said they ought to.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You might think this is my first rodeo, but I've had a lot of arguments/discussions with people convinced that life must be rather well-disciplined and fairly unpleasant to be functional. I do not know why these people follow a woman who lives in a chapel full of ducks and moths.
-
Because I follow you I know it isn't! And I do appreciate the chance to discuss it. Also like the ducks, even if I don't know why
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.