What on earth are you talking about? Kids are designed to digest immense complexity.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @jcrichman and
Adults and kids are both fairly stupid in front of a system that is designed to exploit the stimulus seeking behaviour that served us so well over our evolutionary history
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AustenLamacraft @jcrichman and
This is another really, really bad meme. It's an excuse for people to never confront the reasons they enjoy or desire low status or low social value activities, offered at the cost of calling themselves, their friends and their children stupid.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @jcrichman and
Are you just objecting to the word "stupid"? It's not controversial to say we aren't well adapted to intelligently engineered environments built on value systems that differ from our own (and I mean the basic stuff here like getting food, looking after young, etc.), is it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AustenLamacraft @jcrichman and
Why do you believe that? Is there some external reference for "intelligent" use of tools? "Stupid" is a poor descriptor for the thing you're pointing at, but my objection is to the implication that human beings fully lack agency, whether they're seeking food or trolling twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @jcrichman and
I get the feeling you fundamentally object to the notion of a good use of one’s time. Is this just with respect to kids or adults too? The rejoinder “but people like trolling” is in a sense unanswerable but people liked public executions too
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AustenLamacraft @webdevMason and
I think it’s reasonable to be suspicious of any designation of time well spent, but that doesn’t mean we won’t look back and judge all the same
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AustenLamacraft @jcrichman and
I don't know why you're dodging my question or concerns, here; they're critical to what you're saying now. I don't think anyone is in a good position to evaluate a "good" or "bad" use of time if they think they're merely caught in inescapable evolutionary loops.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @jcrichman and
Learning to fish (on YouTube) is obviously a good use of time if it puts needed food on the table. That’s a sound metric. Adults are more motivated to minimise regret; kids less so, but both can be hacked
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AustenLamacraft @jcrichman and
What's a sound metric? Roughly what percentage of people who have regular access to youtube will ever fish because they won't be able to eat otherwise? If I don't learn to fish, what are the odds I will go hungry as the result?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
More importantly, is there room for childhood at all in a world where the worthiness of any person's activities is evaluated on their potential to meet a plausible future need, however unlikely?
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @jcrichman and
I understand your concern, but I think we can make judgements that still allow huge scope for freedom: that making a TikTok with friends is better than an hour of following recommended links on YouTube by yourself, for example
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AustenLamacraft @jcrichman and
I can imagine plenty of cases where the latter is "worse" on my terms than the former, the former "worse" than the latter, and neither/both worth the time. Rather than go neurotic over it, I do what I want to do within semi-reasonable bounds for health, safety & sustainability.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.