My first thought: never talk to a "journalist" without recording the call and making it clear that you have the right to publish the recording.https://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1247199014627315712 …
Show this thread
-
I don't have any special information, only from following the careers of some journalists. Obviously I can't know what is not in the work but the way assertions are justified and the care for the language give information about the process. Any health that this system has is due/
If you think you can look at a quote and determine on the basis of the eloquence/coherence of the language surrounding it whether it was actually said, you're either unjustifiably naive or possess cognitive powers far beyond my own
-
-
Probably the first one but I'm not referring to quotes. For example, the work that Pamela Colloff did for ProPublica on the Joe Bryan case seems careful in the way that justifies the evidence that brings to the reader. Again, I can't know what was edited out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(I'm aware that I'm putting myself in an easier position because I just have to give exceptions to a trend.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.