My first thought: never talk to a "journalist" without recording the call and making it clear that you have the right to publish the recording.https://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1247199014627315712 …
-
-
I agree with you on both points, that's why I object to "journalists are". The solutions to these problems are not on the individual level and formulating it like it is only breeds cynicism and taking shots among people that already agree with you (precisely the behavior that/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
/you and I don't want in journalism)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't have any special information, only from following the careers of some journalists. Obviously I can't know what is not in the work but the way assertions are justified and the care for the language give information about the process. Any health that this system has is due/
-
If you think you can look at a quote and determine on the basis of the eloquence/coherence of the language surrounding it whether it was actually said, you're either unjustifiably naive or possess cognitive powers far beyond my own
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
/ to the standards of some editors and journalists and these kinds of generalizations put all of the elements of this class in the same level.
-
NYT does it. Who has better standards? Maybe they do it less than the average publication, but they do it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.