Whenever I read the replies on my popular tweets about Amazon, I realize that people have largely forgotten just how godawful online retail/delivery used to be. Maybe it's not fair to give Amazon *all* the credit, but it did force everybody else to raise their game substantially
-
-
If you're concerned that Amazon actually creates systemic weakness by executing so much better than its competitors that its customers avoid shopping elsewhere, that seems less like an Amazon problem and more like an Everyone Else problem.
-
Anyway, people like you & I get to have these fun talks because we can say things like "convenient in the middle of a pandemic," presumably because we don't expect this thing to kill us. Not everyone has that luxury, and those people need services like Amazon so they do not die.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Better than breaking the law is exploiting it. Amazon figured out that the US Postal service was a subsidy in search of a recipient.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The “must break the law” is a strawman. The question is whether they are choosing to break the law, regardless of necessity. There are plenty of successful businesses who also engage in unlawful behavior. See Standard Oil or early Microsoft, or Duetsche Bank for non-monopoly ex
-
Amazon succeeding to the extent that it has would look much stranger if plenty of other online retailers were comparably enjoyable to use. Of course they could still be breaking the law. It's just not a load-bearing claim when you look at how well they've done.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Significantly better frame, but the similarity in coinage does not indicate you're dealing with a remotely similar, insurmountable, or consequential problem
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.