Someone needs to put together a 4-1/2 hour Youtube montage of legitimate health/infectious disease experts just flat contradicting each other on the basics of how this thing spreads.
-
-
-
That's called fox, CNN, etc...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can we trust WHO? WHO has said: 1. No human to human transmission (via PRC) 2. China has no new cases (PRC) 3. Use WHO (faulty) test kits (made in PRC)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there's a tricky distinction some people are making between airborne and aerosol transmission, there was a good thread about this which i've probably lost
-
Right. There are many aerosol droplet sizes and small droplets can get smaller before they land. They can even completely evaporate leaving the virus airborne. Though that should be generally uncommon. So, at the very least even a rudimentary mask can act as a sneeze shield.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They may have better results with: "For the sin of sloth (i.e. not disinfecting hands&surfaces) and weakness of will (touching face) people are punished with the virus, verily I say unto thee." (Actually, it's invisible ghosts. Technically not alive == ghost, right?)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
iirc this was retracted
End of conversation
-
-
-
That one was retracted.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

-avoid touching your 
