Yes, and? Many other differences between Japan and the US, and even there masks aren't always worn correctly to stop infection (check out top picture here and spot the errors).https://www.vox.com/covid-19-coronavirus-explainers/2020/3/28/21196382/japan-coronavirus-cases-covid-19-deaths-quarantine …
-
-
Replying to @aetiology @webdevMason
What is the impact on flu every year of even imperfect mask use?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
People fail to use condoms! we still recommend them
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @aetiology @WatsonLadd
That document does not say wearing a mask increases your risk of acquiring COVID-19, which would be an absurd claim without some pretty extraordinary evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @WatsonLadd
No, because those studies have not yet been done, but it explores some of the risks and prior studies done on other respiratory diseases including influenza. It's not risk-free as some are portraying.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @aetiology @WatsonLadd
What do you mean by "risk-free" in this context? Because you just strongly implied that mask-wearing increases the risk of acquiring a disease, and that's *really* irresponsible without clarification.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Hard to parse limited and somewhat contradictory research. Harm reduction is not a meaningless strategy. While people crowd in a COSTCO masks will probably provide incomplete protection, but in many cases with education, controls, protocols to doff and clean it seems worthwhile.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SargeDonovan @webdevMason and
If people reduce social distancing because they think a mask filters out virus and then they remove it and touch themselves and others that is risky. If they wear it for short duration and follow other recommendations, remove it carefully and disinfect then it could be good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SargeDonovan @webdevMason and
Technology of any kind is rarely good or bad. It depends on all kinds of context. It might be the impact on droplet dispersal is the best, it might be reduction in touching. There needs to a robust public health campaign with this, not just “wear masks”.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There are very few public health interventions that don't require accompanying education, including hand-washing to combat the coronavirus & condoms to prevent STDs. We don't typically warn people against those because they might implement them incorrectly.
-
-
Agreed 100. I think the government warnings are also dangerous, misleading, and confuse the whole debate. The CDC has been really messy in this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SargeDonovan @webdevMason and
There are 0 studies that I know of, of public use of cloth, there are filtration experiments, but only one RCT I know of from 2011 in hospitals. There is good anecdotal and historical data, but what “we know” isn’t as clear, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.