That was the shot, "you're statistically too stupid to properly strap a cloth over your face hole" was the chaser
Show this thread
"Masks don't work for a highly infectious respiratory illness, but also please save them for health workers so they don't get sick" is a pretty dark calibration re: Just Exactly How Stupid Do You Think We Are
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A more honest and effective message would be, “We don’t have enough masks, so please don’t buy masks—we need them for health care workers.” But even then, the logistics don’t work out. It isn’t as though my hospital is buying that box of masks on Amazon if you don’t.
-
"masks are useless" rhetoric contributed massively to the shortages . if they'd been recognized as critical in late january ...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is a misconception If you spend all day within 6 feet of infected people masks are very effective. But you also need to combine them with biohazard suits and face shields. Use of a mask without the other protective measures in casual contact like shopping is not the same.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You will not believe the number of 'smart' people who have fallen for this and propagated it to their mostly mindless followers.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
User error in literally all of this — the gearing up, the hand-washing, the 6-foot gap, all of it. Masks were always going to be much more effective if everyone wore them, placing two barriers between infected and uninfected. Instead, noone does. *That* is stupid.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.