The "HOW DO I DEAL WITH ANXIETY ABOUT CORONAVIRUS?" page is not bad.
-
-
Replying to @reasonisfun @DavidDeutschOxf
Disagree: "It is normal to feel sad, stressed, confused, scared or angry during a crisis." is an error ridden, normative, presumptive, inductive statement. What's more, it appeases to these self-deprecating reactions to a problem situation that mandates rational thinking
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @thethinkersmith @reasonisfun
Good point. I missed that angle.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf @thethinkersmith
1. It *is* normal. 2. This sentence is to help people acknowledge how they're feeling, instead of add pressure to put on a brave face and suppress it. 3. Those reactions aren't self-deprecating. That's like saying your emotions are wrong, instead of the ideas that cause them.
4 replies 0 retweets 45 likes -
Noah Drucker Retweeted Noah Drucker
This is also a valid point. Perhaps instead of saying "not normal" we can say "not required." The same point I wanted to make with
@webdevMasonhttps://twitter.com/DruckerPPS/status/1242483787017019394?s=19 …Noah Drucker added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DruckerPPS @reasonisfun and
In my experience, people who try to either foment or suppress their own fear end up mostly failing *and* bringing worse outcomes upon themselves
4 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @DruckerPPS and
Mason, as I stated to Lulie, suppression only applies to an interpretation that results in a reaction that causes a conflict in ideas. What I teach others is a form of reinterpretation such that what is interpreted does not result in a fear/stress/anxiety... reaction
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thethinkersmith @DruckerPPS and
If people want to do that sort of thing, they're welcome to, but it's precisely how cults work. All those signals most be softened so that attention isn't drawn to axioms that don't make sense and would otherwise raise alarms. Not worth it, IMO
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @DruckerPPS and
Not sure how the cult comment is useful. objectively speaking, if we use fMRI and physiological diagnostics, there's a quantitative difference between a negative emotional response and a rational one. Everyone prospers from the rational state amidst any problem situation
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thethinkersmith @webdevMason and
It seems to have become a discussion of which is "better," higher or animal brain function. I think the difference is whether one is authentically accessing the higher brain function vs simply rationalizing away the animal brain function.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Both can be awful or fun, I don't think people are obligated to spend all their mental energy in either But I take a pretty hard line on negative signals, because it's dangerous to remove the sensory system for "I do not like this at all"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.