-
-
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf
The "HOW DO I DEAL WITH ANXIETY ABOUT CORONAVIRUS?" page is not bad.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @reasonisfun @DavidDeutschOxf
Disagree: "It is normal to feel sad, stressed, confused, scared or angry during a crisis." is an error ridden, normative, presumptive, inductive statement. What's more, it appeases to these self-deprecating reactions to a problem situation that mandates rational thinking
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @thethinkersmith @reasonisfun
Good point. I missed that angle.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf @thethinkersmith
1. It *is* normal. 2. This sentence is to help people acknowledge how they're feeling, instead of add pressure to put on a brave face and suppress it. 3. Those reactions aren't self-deprecating. That's like saying your emotions are wrong, instead of the ideas that cause them.
4 replies 0 retweets 44 likes -
Noah Drucker Retweeted Noah Drucker
This is also a valid point. Perhaps instead of saying "not normal" we can say "not required." The same point I wanted to make with
@webdevMasonhttps://twitter.com/DruckerPPS/status/1242483787017019394?s=19 …Noah Drucker added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DruckerPPS @reasonisfun and
In my experience, people who try to either foment or suppress their own fear end up mostly failing *and* bringing worse outcomes upon themselves
4 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @DruckerPPS and
Mason, as I stated to Lulie, suppression only applies to an interpretation that results in a reaction that causes a conflict in ideas. What I teach others is a form of reinterpretation such that what is interpreted does not result in a fear/stress/anxiety... reaction
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thethinkersmith @DruckerPPS and
If people want to do that sort of thing, they're welcome to, but it's precisely how cults work. All those signals most be softened so that attention isn't drawn to axioms that don't make sense and would otherwise raise alarms. Not worth it, IMO
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @DruckerPPS and
Yes, people are free to react how they wish, however, what's germane to this discussion is whether we can agree that there's a difference between a reaction steeped in emotional turmoil vs one that inspires creative problem solving void of the emotional interference.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I do think there are reactions that do damage/inferfere with progress. But I also think people way too often try to think themselves out of hearing a STRONG "this is a bad situation" signal, when it would be much better and less painful overall if they removed themselves first.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @DruckerPPS and
Sure, it makes to step out of the way of a charging rhino (regardless of what a contravening thought might be). Different from that is what I'm referring to which is interpreting reality through lens of rationality
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thethinkersmith @webdevMason and
I'm confused by this thread. 1. Why are negative emotions bad? 2. Do you think you've found the secret to not having them in the first place? (If so, what do you think emotions are?) 3. What's your theory of why people don't do this already? 4. How does your theory solve that?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.