People need to not be drinking fish water conditioners and they also need to not be afraid to take chloroquine if a doctor prescribes it. Can we please, please be a little more reflective about this stuff?
Show this thread
I don't know if chloroquine will turn out to be part of an empirically validated protocol for COVID-19, but I do know that it's irresponsible to write headlines implying people are dying from the medication when they actually ODed on a product for treating fish tankshttps://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1242212084647104514 …
-
-
-
I am genuinely floored at how many outlets thought this was OKpic.twitter.com/aM4slUnFEN
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Enemy of the people. It’s not hyperbole.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't need the president to tell me not to drink fish tank sanitizer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At least they used the word "self-medicating." I'd use the word "overdose" too. One benefit of pills is that they're precisely measured, and there are instructions for how many to use.
-
Someone can buy paracetamol powder and take enough to die of liver failure if they'd like. That isn't even a rare event, so it won't make the news and the widow won't get to say it was Trump's idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Finding myself with the snarky response: "shut down all news outlets. they are not an essential service" My actual perspective... hm. Probably not implementable. No opinion pieces? No reporting on weird-ass behavior of individuals at all? Hm.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And it’s also irresponsible for the president to name a drug on national TV which has not been tested or approved by the FDA!And about which Dr Fauci quickly corrected the president! Once again, Trump speaks about things which he knows nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IMO, infinitely worse than this - because we already know these ppl are dirty - are the publications who position themselves as fundamentally above the fray and then post this as a "you're hearing it from us; trust us, this is bad." https://twitter.com/NewsfromScience/status/1242081196982575105 … When in fact:
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.