You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I suspect there's a lot to learn from looking at features of lies which seem to help vs. hinder candidates, e.g. - whether the claim seems "directionally" true - whether evaluating the claim seems accessible to the general public - whether the claim seems directly self-serving
Elizabeth Warren's claim to Native American ancestry hit all three in the worst way — it seemed directionally false (she's white, guys), it seemed *exceptionally* self-serving, and stuff like DNA test results just confused most people (reasonably, in the context of this purpose)
Meanwhile, a bunch of Trump's false claims seem directionally true (and sometimes are, albeit for complex reasons). They don't seem self-serving (e.g. a Mexican national isn't going to take *his job*) & they tend not to appeal to authorities no typical person knows how to contest
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
