I'm assuming most people who voted misread it and didn't see the "LESS THAN"??? Otherwise, the wisdom of the crowd is a bit scary.
-
-
-
Judging by the similarity to this poll (which asks the opposite), I assume ppl misread.https://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1234201322741616640?s=19 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At a 0.5% death rate, that would be <2 million infected. That's around 6% of the population. Don't think the virus was contained, so we'll see a higher percent of the population infected. Division and multiplication has never made me this nervous, I'll be honest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so far Hubei province has about 50 deaths per million residents for a novel disease that hit during their biggest travel season. if this is the midpoint for Hubei and they reach 6,000 victims, I think US will stay under 10,000 because of foreknowledge
-
I think the expected case is bad, but not going to cause chaos, but the worst case is really bad, like if you made a list of ppl with no medical care globally, what if it goes around between them for the next year. or what if airports have to do illness screening, forever
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.