NYT Daily ep on the coronavirus is *fascinating* — just a nonchalant convo about how this looks like another 1918 flu. For a lot of listeners, I'd guess this was the moment they realized that the tone of media elites would be roughly the same with or without mass graves looming
-
-
Secondary bacterial infections caused the vast majority of deaths from Spanish Flu (https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/bacterial-pneumonia-caused-most-deaths-1918-influenza-pandemic …). We've had over a *century* of health research since, including novel antivirals (like Gilead's remdesivir) that are promising enough to see use in this outbreak.
-
Secondary bacterial infections are not causing the deaths that are occuring with the illness in front of us *now.* Clearly the situation would be much, much worse if we didn't have antibiotics or antivirals. It'll be very bad if we see shortages.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sanitation is on point for the West, countries like India and Mexico tho have sanitation that is in some cases worse than the US in 1918
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.