In the case of colleges, it's about gaming the metrics / ranking systems. The students happily play along in return for a lottery ticket.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YES, this is especially frustrating with higher ed. Some programs don't disclose screening criteria/expectations until deep into the application process. Easy to market a strong top-of-funnel & selective admissions.
-
I think I recall some schools actually marketing to unqualified people specifically for these kinds of metrics
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't this also wasting your own time? I gotta believe there is a more productive thing to do for just about everyone than interviewing a bunch of people you don't plan to hire.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And probs have an HR/admissions department which justifies its existence by an expanding cycle of mutual time wasting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Proper communication would be you looking at the description/requirement and being able to tell correctly whether you qualify and a are good fit and should apply or not. Low% acceptance means way too many people thought they should apply when they shouldn't. (Bad communication.)
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YC only accepts a small percentage of applicants, but they certainly don't want to waste anyone's time.
-
To confirm: We spent 3 hours preparing an application, 10 minutes interviewing, and had an expenses-paid trip to the valley, which more than made up for the cost of applying. The chance of getting in also makes up for the small cost of applying...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


