I'm *really* excited by initiatives on this scale from people like Bezos, because he at least has the money and talent (people). Government is absolutely loaded but has great difficulty identifying and retaining talent. (Don't get me started on ideas...)https://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1168375858832084992?s=20 …
-
Show this thread
-
tbh, the cynicism is annoying enough for the undergirding "meh" sentiment alone — like, the second Bezos decides to take a real crack at it climate change is no longer an all-hands-on-deck imminent existential threat, but more of a checklist item post socialist revolution
2 replies 11 retweets 126 likesShow this thread -
What really irritates me is just that I don't think very many people actually care. This isn't how people act when they care. When your house is on fire, you don't start asking around to figure out whether the firefighters are pure enough of heart to put the fucking thing out
5 replies 12 retweets 212 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
I also feel a lot of irritation at this. However, if try to get in the mindset of a True Believer, I get the following: Climate change and inequality are generated by the same thing. Corrupt capitalist systems that reward immoral billionaires and no one else
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JeffLadish @webdevMason
If you think Billionaires are *the enemy*, responsible for the evils of climate change and inequality, then you see any effort by this class to address one without the other as a dangerous distraction at best. They believe the only solution is deeply structural, and that any...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JeffLadish @webdevMason
...efforts short of this are doomed to fail. Yes, this all or nothing philosophy is deeply destructive, especially to efforts to mitigate climate damage, but it *is* internally consistent.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JeffLadish @webdevMason
I'm not saying that most people criticizing Bezos are True Believers who have thought deeply about this. But I do think they are taking their social cues from those that have. It's unfortunate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffLadish
I don't want to say that someone who truly fits this characterization is *impossible,* but I think they're roughly as feasible as someone who thinks that the proper way to respond to their house currently being on fire is to start fixing their sprinkler system.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @JeffLadish
If someone does actually respond to their house being on fire by working on their sprinkler system, I'm going to conclude that they either don't *actually believe* the fire is real, have some motive to allow their home to be destroyed or have gone genuinely insane.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @JeffLadish
As a metaphor for climate change, I think the proper conclusion to draw is that most people don't actually believe the fire is real. The fire is "real" when it's useful for making some political points they like, helping "their guy" win, or scoring social points; otherwise, meh.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
(In this analogy, maybe an operational sprinkler system would actually be useful against the blaze. It doesn't change the fact that there are clearly other means by which fires are put out, and some of them are more actually accessible for *this* fire.)
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @JeffLadish
Climate Hysteria constitutes nothing more than a total sham used to push for Socialism. Plan and simple.https://www.prageru.com/playlist/what-science-reveals-about-climate-change/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.