Broadly speaking, humans are prone to get into serious trouble when they attempt massive-scale things straight out of the gate, but they also don't try to do nearly *enough* things
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
They also fuck up *much, much* more when they're incentivized to *look like* they're trying to do something rather than incentivized to actually do the thing, and it's not always clear to anyone involved which of the two is happening or that there is a distinction at all
Prikaži ovu nit -
If it's not clear why this is, consider this: Is it easier to solve a very hard problem, or... ...to accidentally/subtly introduce or neglect obstacles that you can later use as evidence that it wasn't your fault that the problem didn't get solved?https://twitter.com/webdevmason/status/1222681556960940033?s=21 …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
In the same vein I regularly tell my organization that a bad decision is better than no decision. Do not employ avoidance. Don’t dither. If we “break” something we sort out what went wrong, learn, fix and move ahead. Despise waiting. Waiting sucks
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Basically, (1)The best thing you can do is the right thing. (2) Next best is the wrong thing. (3) The worst, is nothing. Arguably, 1 & 2 are interchangable if you learn something from 2.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.