I recommend reading the post; interesting points wrt why grant-funded software projects may be weaker out of the gate (and less likely to become crucial infrastructure, especially long-term) than peer-production projects
Show this thread
"'How many software packages that are central to science were made as a result of grants?' I hope (and imagine) the answer is not zero, but I am not familiar with any examples."https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/1214620497318559744 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BLAS, LINPACK, LAPACK...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One example is Micro-Manager, which I worked on for a few years. It was funded by NIH grants. Used by bioscience laboratories to control light microscopes. http://www.microscopist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/mb1420.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ImageJ 100%, and some part of related things like SciJava, SCIFIO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like something
@nayafia might knowhttps://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1214642802656563200 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that’s the core point of the article - the author thinks more funding should go to maintaining popular projects, rather than starting new ones
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The software that enabled the internet was funded by DARPA. Maybe this one example alone justifies a few decades of false starts in other areas?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.