All the employees that worked in bookstores making minimum wage, the truckers that had to deliver her books while barely getting by, movie theater employees, need I continue? You can't make a billion without exploiting someone along the way.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Unendedquest @cmac324 and
I'm not saying the exploitation was intentional. I'm saying the system is broken and allows for people to be exploited for gain. If the people getting exploited had a safety net they could bargain for more. However they have no bargaining power. (Cause Unions have been destroyed)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Unendedquest @BigCougSteve and
You & I likely agree that societal safety nets are vital both to human well-being & to ensuring that everyone spends their time/energy on their best possible work in the world, but people who believe all wealth is aggregated through exploitation really don't have ears for this.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @Unendedquest and
Not all wealth. Wealth over $1 billion. Once you reach that threshold and continue to try and accumulate wealth you become a villain. You have 100% freedom in your life at that point and could help millions that are not able to help themselves.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BigCougSteve @Unendedquest and
Look, I can't continue talking to you about this until you give me some indication that you understand the difference between founding a company with some valuation & literally having that money in the bank, such that you or someone else could actually spend it to help themselves
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @BigCougSteve and
Even a lot of these founders spend long periods of time living off of *loans* so they don't have to sell their ownership stake in the companies they're building in order to pay their bills. This kind of wealth is not the same thing as having a wallet full of cash.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @Unendedquest and
You've moved on to a different point. My point is that we should create a system where this type of risk of ruin isn't necessary at the expense of capping your success at $1 billion. Failure shouldn't mean being destitute. As some must fail for others to succeed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"Billionaires should/shouldn't exist" runs almost orthogonal to "effective safety nets should/shouldn't exist." At some point, you're going to have to decide whether your priority is soaking the rich or helping the poor. This is not a zero-sum world; they're not the same thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.