"The countries that empower women also empower them, indirectly, to pick whatever career they’d enjoy most and be best at."https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/02/the-more-gender-equality-the-fewer-women-in-stem/553592/ …
-
Paul, you quoted the weakest point in a piece rife w/ flaws: conflating science/math/CS; leaping from correlation to causation; cherry-picking data to fit a provocative thesis. It buried the finding that “girls performed as well or better than boys on science in most countries.”
What do you mean, "buried"? It's central to the argument. I almost shudder to ask what you think the thesis is.
-
-
It buried in his tweet what Ali really thinks about the piece.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mason, the article’s vile thesis is: “in countries that empower women, they’re less likely to choose math & science,” because they’d “enjoy & be best at” other pursuits. (The pesky fact that girls broadly outperform boys in science is negated instantly by the word “but.”)
-
Do you understand that the idea that women are freely choosing pursuits outside of STEM is predicated on their demonstrated ability to successfully pursue STEM?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.