(This wasn't me. I think I'm pretty, but like... ~top 25%. I probably couldn't command $xxxx/night, at least not on looks alone)
Show this thread
I was recently asked by someone, genuinely, why a woman well into the top 1-2% of attractiveness would sell sex rather than apply that credit toward any number of higher-status industries. IMO, it's bc top-tier sex workers value recapturing time over most typical prioriteshttps://twitter.com/QiaochuYuan/status/1198790382839975936 …
-
-
-
Actually, you know what, self-esteem and cleanse diet aside let's just pretend that I never implied to the broader internet that I'd given a lot of thought to what my price on the open sex market would bepic.twitter.com/wGLJoT4947
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
She's also probably not that smart or informed on how she could apply it to other industries
-
I think you're probably just wrong, here: there are lots of plausible paths for translating good looks and decent charisma into a career, but they do usually involve 40-60 hour work weeks rather than 4-8 hour work weeks
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And I'm guessing you've seen the "gold diggers, like hookers but smarter" shirts
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It seems like sex workers in that tier often also keep thier other jobs and probably don’t tell most ppl they are sex workers..so they don’t lose “credit”. would also love to see societal norms move towards seeing humans as not losing value when they have sex, for money or not
-
Is it still seen primarily as a loss of value, do you think, or more as dangerous to the worker / disruptive &/or dangerous to clients / family / society ?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah but a whole lot of sex workers aren't really in the top 1-2% of attractiveness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.