What percentage would you say have (a) thought about it -> looked into it -> decided it's pointless to do anything vs. (b) not even thought about it?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
The brilliant thing about the NRA is that it's as much a hobbiest membership org as it is a lobbying group. Imagine if Zuck were able to divert all the outrage he gets toward a group of happy Facebook users, without even making it clear he was doing that — it's very, very smart.
-
-
That’s a slightly disingenuous characterization of the NRA. Their annual revenue in 2018 was $412B, whereas Facebook’s was $55B. ‘Hobbyist’ origin aside, that’s enough cash to generate its own gravity well. Src: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association …
-
I think that your original point was to question why people orient themselves against the obvious (shiny?) entity and not the root-cause. And it’s a good one. But the NRA is a poor example because, at that scale, isn’t it root-cause of another whole system of troublesome ideas?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.