Holy crap — a girl posted "There's a rapist in our school and you know who it is" in her school, which, of course, led to rumors & bullying. The ACLU argued that this was taking a "public stance as an ally for victims and survivors of sexual violence."https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50171701 …
-
-
Since herself did not know of a rapist, you could argue that the "you know who it is" phrase does disrupt, and that the claim did cause disruption w/o sincerely furthering a legitimate political or public purpose. Would have to actually read the judgment to really figure out.
-
After some further thought, and still not having actually read the judgment, the schoolgirl, ACLU, and Judge all probably acted and ruled correctly. Emphasizing the existence of rapists, and requesting peers to attempt to identify them does further a matter of public concern.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.