It's really sad to me that "care about the people you have sex with, and have sex with people who care about you" hasn't taken off as a norm. For just nearly everyone within the human bell curve, this works.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @ProperOpinion
We've gotten weird and legalistic about this because we think we can formalize pseudo-caring. This doesn't work super well in the best of contexts, and sex has got to be pretty close to the worst place for it
2 replies 1 retweet 66 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think it does! For example, I think most people implictly understand that things need to go a bit differently if you're having sex with someone who has been a victim of sexual assault, especially recently. Truly caring bridges a lot of gaps.
0 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
True. Good sex is such a boon for humanity, but we're too caught up in determining what *acceptable* sex looks like to have a mainstream conversation about achieving sexual intimacy
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @ProperOpinion
Fear is such a negative force against intimacy, and yet — intimacy can be an equally powerfully force against fear. Genuine caring is what I think navigates the space between. Love really does rule.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes
IMO, we need to be honest about the fact that decoupling sex from intimacy is risky business, and we don't really know how to manage it from there. Sliding "the rules" around certainly doesn't cause intimacy to emerge, and it's not clear that it even mitigates immediate harm
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.