It's really sad to me that "care about the people you have sex with, and have sex with people who care about you" hasn't taken off as a norm. For just nearly everyone within the human bell curve, this works.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
True. Good sex is such a boon for humanity, but we're too caught up in determining what *acceptable* sex looks like to have a mainstream conversation about achieving sexual intimacy
-
-
Fear is such a negative force against intimacy, and yet — intimacy can be an equally powerfully force against fear. Genuine caring is what I think navigates the space between. Love really does rule.
-
IMO, we need to be honest about the fact that decoupling sex from intimacy is risky business, and we don't really know how to manage it from there. Sliding "the rules" around certainly doesn't cause intimacy to emerge, and it's not clear that it even mitigates immediate harm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The public accountability angle plays here as well: you can argue that good sex is sex that works between two (or more?) people, because of who they are together; but if everything is public and accountable, than Good Sex is understand as abstractly good, good for everyone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.