SF has recently implemented & continues to consider a slew of tax + regulatory policies that no growing tech company would subject itself to were it not the sole superior option re: access to capital + talent. If an industry flight occurs *once,* the ground is salted. https://t.co/JQ3uRtKM2i
-
-
Note that SF is a barely-liveable city even with the immense budget it has now. From where I'm standing, it appears to have no idea how to evaluate its extant programs & certainly no idea how to trim fat. If it's not a prime candidate for New Detroit, I don't know what city is
Show this thread -
SF has advantages it'll keep. It's a geographically well-positioned city, a major port in a beautiful part of the country. But it's also creating other long-run burdens for itself, e.g. a growing pop of serious drug addicts & deeply neglected public transit + education systems
Show this thread -
Lest you think SF will rapidly come to its senses if/when the exodus starts happening in earnest, let me remind you that this is a city that can't come to any kind of consensus on whether it can abate its crisis-level lack of housing by creating more housing
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
“Assuming rational people are governing SF” no snark and in all seriousness, what about the last several centuries of human history leads you to conclude that this is a reasonable assumption.
End of conversation
-
-
-
“Equilibrium will always ensue” well yes, but it may not be an equilibrium that you like. Many once-thriving cities, cities that were world famous as centers of industry and innovation 100 years ago have seen an “equilibrium ensue”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.