Your daily reminder that "in a nutshell, so-and-so said..." should raise flags, even when you're reading that line in an ostensibly reputable publicationhttps://twitter.com/balajis/status/1187151642572906497 …
Show this thread
-
Of course, not everyone is acting in good faith. But some contexts are easier to evaluate than others: a talk given to a relatively large audience, transcribed, etc. vs. e.g. a private conversation. FWIW, I fully believe Balaji to be a deeply sincere person across the board.
Show this thread
The important thing is that the typical reader ought to be able to very easily make the distinction between what the subject has said or done, and the writer's interpretation of those statements or actions. This is an absolutely sacred line, IMO.
-
-
Did you feel like "secession" was an unfair way to summarize Balaji's proposal? “build an opt-in society, ultimately outside the United States, run by technology" I went into the article expecting that to be a misrepresentation (because Anand does that a lot) but it seemed apt?
-
Isn't that more just... immigrating to a new society, regardless of how recently said society was established? It'd be seceding if you tried to set up a new country within (and on the land of) an existing country. Ppl who move to Europe aren't seceding.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.