I prob think this is a harder problem than you do, while admitting that your opinion in particular is clearly enough to update on. (But I would feel very differently about this were it e.g. Stripe, a large company with consistently demonstrated & highly relevant tech competency.)
-
It’s an audacious claim to say cloud providers will take these players out, and not one I think I agree with. Both the cloud and on prem guys are going to be using similar tooling, and it becomes a far more cooled business enablement problem at this point
This strikes me as akin to saying that a *physical* bank is doomed to get cut out of the market eventually if it leases rather than owns the property on which it stores its vaults, because storing paper notes is the whole business
-
-
But BoA is actually in the business of creating & marketing financial products, which requires securely storing bits. There may be good reasons for SpaceX to manufacture bolts, as rockets require bolts, but whether or not it makes sense to outsource bolt-making is a big question
-
If BoAs primary business mode was to *simply secure bits* then they would have one if the strongest cyber offerings on the market, especially given the regulatory requirement to have one. It’s not. It’s a business requirement (and risk if non compliant) but their core is banking
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Businesses win by staying true to their model. If running physical or cyber infrastructure isn’t one of them, then don’t compete on doing it, and focus on what does actually work for you. Strong agree. Full send
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.