Yes, and — IMO — you should consider seeking out relationships with cumulative risk and reward if you don't have them already. Intimacy builds naturally in relationships where people aren't filling roles where they're fungible, like companionship. That's vital, but not sufficienthttps://twitter.com/simonsarris/status/1182344417887358976 …
-
-
To love someone is to make yourself extremely vulnerable to their own outcomes. If what happens to them isn't intertwined with what happens to you on some deeply important level, I don't know how you can call that "love"
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I need that on a card for my next anniversary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
love is not investment. while it is high risk, love must exist when there is no reward and, further, when there is negative return. it is commitment.
-
I'm not using either "risk" or "reward" in a strictly material sense, here. It's risky to love, in part, because another person's hurts and fears become yours, too. It's rewarding to love, in part, because their joy becomes your joy.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.