You said there's no added value. I agree that 30% seems high, but clearly there's value in a platform that gives developers access to 55% of their target market.
-
I don't really understand where this confusion is coming from. There's a big difference between putting a fence around an existing lake and instituting an access fee vs. building a *new* artificial lake where there's likely to be demand and charging access to that.
You don't want to incentivize new fences around extant lakes. You may very well want to incentivize new lakes.
-
-
I think perceived price gouging is being confused for rent seeking. At least in this specific disagreement.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.