You said there's no added value. I agree that 30% seems high, but clearly there's value in a platform that gives developers access to 55% of their target market.
I don't really understand where this confusion is coming from. There's a big difference between putting a fence around an existing lake and instituting an access fee vs. building a *new* artificial lake where there's likely to be demand and charging access to that.
-
-
You don't want to incentivize new fences around extant lakes. You may very well want to incentivize new lakes.
-
I think perceived price gouging is being confused for rent seeking. At least in this specific disagreement.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.