take of the day is that I think it's weird to prefer a world where monstrous people presumably buy more yachts or whatever and absolutely no public research, even anonymously
-
I think there’s a fairly big difference between selling someone a house or a boat and actively working with him over an extended period of time.
If you sell someone anything with that kind of price tag, you absolutely end up working with them for an extended period. I've both worked in non-profit & seen real estate deals go through; I think this is a big stretch
-
-
If that’s the case, I would say that we should pay more scrutiny to the people who sold him houses and boats, not less scrutiny to the people who worked with him on philanthropic stuff.
-
I think that's a much stronger position. As it stands, social norms are dictating incentives that seem likely to drive more luxury consumption/wealth accrual and less public benefit wrt godawful criminals, which again just seems very weird
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.