take of the day is that I think it's weird to prefer a world where monstrous people presumably buy more yachts or whatever and absolutely no public research, even anonymously
-
Seems like a disingenuous take. People aren’t upset that Bill Gates and company gave anonymously to MIT. They’re upset that they did it through a guy who sexually trafficked underage girls.
I'm talking about Epstein's money, not Gates'. It seems extremely sensible to be concerned about the *many* prominent people who had a relationship with Epstein, what they knew and what they may have participated in
-
-
But wouldn’t those prominent people include the people at MIT who were willing to collaborate with/take money from Epstein despite his horrible crimes?
-
Sure, if there's any indication that they withheld information from e.g. the feds or participated in crime. But we're not asking these questions about people who sold him luxury properties or products — I guess that's kosher?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.