Some of the loudest Proponents of Science — an identity moreso than a descriptor — are scientifically illiterate. If you say stuff like "there's a consensus in the field" or "this has been established for 50 years," and can't go any deeper than that, you're just chanting doctrine
-
Show this thread
-
First rule of fight club is know what you don't know. Don't hang your hat on statements about the state if the system that produces science in order to imply knowledge you do not have about its contents. Go learn, think. The men in white coats don't own the nature of the universe
5 replies 8 retweets 119 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason @DragonGod2718
Absurd. Your very first statement is an impossibility, and everything after that is just a strawman. Use science, and seek that which can transcend it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You think it's impossible for anyone identifying as or considered a "proponent of science" to be scientifically illiterate? I've got a few grant proposals to sell you
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.