Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️

There are. No. Points.

I think you misunderstood me. I’m referring to the listed labels. These aren’t points, but seems like they’re possible traits that the creator would want an economy to amplify. They all seem reasonably good.

I will redirect you to my own diagram, which I'm sure you'll appreciate since it indicates very clearly that I'm in favor of the entire set of good things. It's similarly contentless, but apparently that's a non-issue.

So were treading into Foucaultian waters now and just denying others propositions on the basis that these labels are meaningless? These were all picked probably for the reason that people think that they’re missing from our economy, and you say that they lack content?

Explain to me what the proposition between "feminine economy -> embodiment" means. Consult the diagram if you need to.

Ah, the weakest link. Seems more like a personal problem rather than something we can provide an economic solution for — i'll cede that. But embodiment has been used in the context of "feeling like yourself" which is something many customer service jobs squash.

You really think "embodiment" means "feeling like yourself"?

I never use it in that context, but it's used in the *consciousness* community as that. Semantics. Anyways, we've been picking at my responses and not addressing the initial question which is all I wanted to know — are these objectionable traits for us to amplify in the economy?