Mason  🏃‍♂️ ✂️

You could say the same about “markets -> human flourishing”. You’re judging the facade of the house without stepping in.

If you find a diagram for that somewhere, let me know. I bet you won't, because it's a very crappy hack, and if your house's facade is covered in peeling duct tape it's not really on me to show myself in

It’s the brief summation that many who’ve read Smith would give to you; a bit dated for a diagram. “Human Flourishing” is such a lossy term, at least this diagram pointed out some high quality aspects of the human experience. Are we judging the points or the “feminist” label?

There are. No. Points.

I think you misunderstood me. I’m referring to the listed labels. These aren’t points, but seems like they’re possible traits that the creator would want an economy to amplify. They all seem reasonably good.

I will redirect you to my own diagram, which I'm sure you'll appreciate since it indicates very clearly that I'm in favor of the entire set of good things. It's similarly contentless, but apparently that's a non-issue.

So were treading into Foucaultian waters now and just denying others propositions on the basis that these labels are meaningless? These were all picked probably for the reason that people think that they’re missing from our economy, and you say that they lack content?