Make wealthy benefactors cool again
-
-
I'm serious. The memetic environment around high net worth giving is FUBAR. We're somehow more comfortable with concentrating taste-making in a tiny handful of hermetically sealed institutions than having a broad set of relatively rich people directly support artists & scholars
11 replies 7 retweets 83 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @webdevMason
I'm really worried about the 2nd order effects. For example, Epstein had a bunch of really successful academics that were cravenly sucking up to him for cash - if rich person patronage becomes the norm, you'd start to see it as a de facto requirement in tenure applications.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @F_Vaggi @webdevMason
For example, it's basically an unspoken rule at many universities that in order to get tenure in biomedical research you need a certain number of renewed RO1 grants. I can see a grim future where scientists have to have a certain number of patrons to be considered for tenure.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @F_Vaggi @webdevMason
would you need an institution if you were paid directly by a benefactor?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
That would probably be even worse. At least an institutional layer (poorly) insulates a scientist from the whims of their patron.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Institutions are worse. But if you don't believe so, fine with me. You can keep the institutions. I'm just suggesting they have to compete for minds with a funding infrastructure that might be a bit less... what's the word... soul-shattering
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Chasing grants is the worst part of an academic career and I'm incredibly glad that's behind me now. I think encouraging more giving by the ultra wealthy is a great goal, but, direct funding of scientists is troublesome.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'd like you to articulate exactly what's worse about a world where scholars — and I explicitly say "scholars" rather than "academics," here — may be able to do their work with an individual's support rather than enduring what would otherwise be "the worst part" of their career.
-
-
Because, without any kind of institutional layer separating scholars from their founders, you'd turn scholars into massive sycophants. You saw how cravenly and pathetic Epstein's hanger-ons were? Now imagine if they depended entirely on Epstein's largess.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @F_Vaggi @webdevMason and
Even incredible funding institutions like the Arnold foundation, the Gates foundation, etc, channel most of their giving through institutional bodies instead of writing blank checks to scientists they directly employ. Let's get 100 different foundations in place instead.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.