The first mainstream story is that intellectual abilities are fixed. The second mainstream story is that good schools improve ingenuity and problem-solving. People alternate freely between these depending on what they're trying to get funded
-
-
Show this thread
-
One more coherent story is that intellectual abilities are indeed fixed, and good schools don't make anyone smarter but train enough obedience and "work ethic" to allow the workforce to wring whatever they can from whichever dull or sharp intellect is handed to them
Show this thread -
Another more coherent story is that intellectual abilities are *not* fixed, but schools are just pretty bad at training ingenuity and problem-solving despite genuine efforts
Show this thread -
The story I tend to think lies closer to the truth is that many useful intellectual abilities are *not* fixed, *but* that schools are organized to treat them as though they are for a broad set of reasons, including the interests of labor consumers
Show this thread -
One troublesome thing is that productivity growth — critical to economic growth + improvements to quality of life — is variable over industries and the industries demanding the obedient, arbitrarily hard-working people we're trying to produce tend to have low productivity growth
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Peoples’ IQs are certainly not fixed throughout their lives. However, as people age, IQs more and more reflect innate ability. IQ is almost as heritable as height. People can get better at things, surely. But that’s learning. IQ is not learning. It’s the ability to learn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When people ask me who is signing up for Prenda I describe exactly these parents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.