Not true. The smart kids will learn even if you hide their books in the attic. The dumb kids won’t learn even if you hide their food in the books.
-
-
Replying to @pumkinbaer @JamesonHalpern
If you define "smart kids" as "kids who learn even if you hide their books in the attic," and define "dumb kids" as "kids who won't learn even if you hide their food in the books," this is of course true. But then you're just playing with definitions, not making an observation
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @JamesonHalpern
Nope, I’m just defining smart people as people who can solve problems
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pumkinbaer @JamesonHalpern
Plenty of people who can solve various kinds of problems don't, whether or not there's food hidden in their books
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @JamesonHalpern
There is a large crowd of unsolved problems accompanied by an even larger crowd of helpless people that beg to differ with you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pumkinbaer @JamesonHalpern
Lots of people are or feel helpless for reasons that have very little to do with cognitive ability, particularly the abilities captured by IQ (ability to work through certain kinds of toy problems at high speed)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
There's no doubt that it's very helpful in life to have that ability to some exceptional degree, but that's probably not the bottleneck in most lives, given that most real-world problems aren't attached to a short timer and vary widely in complexity
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @JamesonHalpern
Life is rife with little timers, and in any case removing them doesn’t change the relative results. High scorers today would use the extra time better just like they use the given time now, and end up the high scorers of tomorrow as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pumkinbaer @JamesonHalpern
If we were all tasked with precisely the same work + challenges in life, this would probably be an important truth. But as it stands, there are plenty of problems to go around, & the scientist who makes his breakthrough in 2 years & the one who makes his in 20 are both celebrated
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @JamesonHalpern
Look, I get it. Life would be nicer if the tortoise could win. But that’s not the way to bet or make policy. It’s just what we say to sooth our slower kids. Those 20 year breakthroughs don’t come from dumb hard workers. They come from smart people solving extra hard problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'm not saying that every human mind can solve any problem given a lifetime. Give me a neurodegenerative disease or other brain damage & many ideas may fall out of reach. Likewise, successful scientists tend to have high IQs —but not all of them & certainly not to the same degree
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @pumkinbaer
Original point, IQs DO shift throughout lifespan. Failing to give kids early childhood stimulation and learning WILL stunt their intellect. Not all Nobel Prize winners and other achievers have extremely high IQs. Not all of them even have high level formal ed (eg Faraday)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.