Antifragility is great for innovation, competition and volatile environments. Fragility is great for stability, risk aversion and the interests of hierarchies and institutions afraid of disruption. Right now there's a lot of deception re: which track we're on & who it's good for
-
-
Show this thread
-
The story is that K-12 schools & universities — the "good" ones, at least — are already training people to take risks, generate ideas + "change the world." If you believe that, I've got a socialist utopia to sell you, but you should consider why you want to buy it
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm confused though. Is collectively fighting back against the dominant historical bullies until defenders of old-bullies call you a new scary kind of fragile-bully a sign of fragility or anti-fragility?
-
You have to know there's absolutely no way I'm going to answer a question phrased this way, but I want to point out that you're short a few history classes if you don't think dominant historical bullies include both governments and private interests
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where did she suggest stopping schooling? *confused*
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.