A few of the things that the Koch brothers have fought against: - Interventionist Wars - Militarization of the Police - Long sentences for non-violent crimes If you are celebrating David Koch's death you don't care about the issues. You are just brainwashed.
-
-
Replying to @DanielSifredo @webdevMason
He also fought against enacting any climate policy at all, which dwarfs the impact of the rest by many orders of magnitude.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @moultano @webdevMason
If you are going to hate anyone in the political realm because they disagree with you on one issue good luck moving anything forward. Also Koch believed in free market solutions to climate change not government regulated ones and honestly that's probably the right view.
5 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
That’s not really true. There’s a wealth of reporting on their central role in climate change denial - and the fact that their “positions” were less about libertarianism/free markets and more about protecting their own fossil fuel profits.https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/kochland-examines-how-the-koch-brothers-made-their-fortune-and-the-influence-it-bought/amp …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
These aren't mutually exclusive. It's entirely possible to hold a self-serving "position" against global wars in part, perhaps in large part, because you don't want to be blown up. I don't see anything in that piece that defends the claim you're making.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Which claim? That they funded climate change denial? Or that they had fossil fuel interests to protect?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bhayyar @webdevMason and
Also let’s be real: we’re not talking about holding just any position out of self-interest. I agree. That’s fine. We’re talking about spending massive amounts of money on propaganda that has had unconscionable impact.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The claim you made is that they haven't been motivated by libertarianism/a position on free markets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @bhayyar and
Thinking it unconscionable to spend vast sums of money on messaging broadly, in cases where it's motivated promarily by self-interest, or in cases where it's motivated primarily by sincerely-held principle are all very different positions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @bhayyar and
Presumably you don't think *all* of the political activities they substantially funded were motivated by self-interest. I don't know to what extent they worked against their own principles for their interests, but I haven't seen much evidence provided
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
For what it's worth, I think the Koch position on both climate change and government regulation are both off-kilter, but the latter considerably less so than the former
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.