You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A conspiracy theorist, if violent, can hurt someone like you or me. But a conspiracy *theory* mostly threatens to hurt a narrative, and thus a narrator. Who will, of course, explain that the theorist is out to kill you.
I think anti-vaccine hysteria is probably unfounded and almost certainly extremely harmful on net. But watch anti-vax become the gun that every academic who has an unpopular hypothesis to kill in whichever field will plant on their target as though that makes any sense at all
tbc, nobody has to say that their academic opponent *is* an anti-vaxxer. They just have to remind you that science is canon, canon is science, and what falls outside kills children
And now there aren't substantiated and unsubstantiated hypotheses, there is only science and pseudoscience. There aren't explanations of varying strength and credibility, there's only the canon truth and the conspiracy theories
The bottom line is that anyone who derives some truly substantial power from the current canon is unlikely to tolerate this nuance, because while real truth-seeking tips a hat to the canon, it never defers to it, and it ceases to be real truth-seeking the moment that it does.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
