This thread is a bizarre read. The challenges involved with humanely detaining violent offenders with severe mental illness, ordering & compelling treatment, etc., are not new. SF is a very rich city within a very rich state with exceptionally strong public services, inc medical.https://twitter.com/GeorgeGascon/status/1162372342359527424 …
-
-
The cynical take: there's a distributed & diluted sense of responsibility for our safety, the public's malaise implies that heads won't roll until this individual kills someone, & the next victim will more likely than not be homeless herself & unlikely to draw so much attention.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GeorgeGascon isn't just hand waving. He did argue for confinement of the mentally ill defendant. The DA does not have authority over the city or state budget, the Bd Supes / City Council / Mayor has that power in SF. His 7 tweets appropriately request more mental beds.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems like drugs were probably a significant factor. Limiting drug use in San Francisco would be hard and a certain proportion of users are going to become irrational and violent. I'm not against trying but more psych beds at SF General won't do it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.