You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I don’t admit that at all. And I don’t think expecting Quillette to do some soul searching in the wake of being hoaxed is a “punishment” — it’s what we ask of academia post Sokal Squared. And to you great point up top, it’s what we should ask of mainstream press.
Asking for what you claim to want is almost always pointless unless accompanied by some evidence that you actually want it. I'm not seeing it.
I am a huge fan of Sokal and scholarly rigour, and I genuinely believe that they would not have published that article if it didn't tell them what they wanted to hear. People should be a lot more skeptical of narratives when they align so closely with their ideological priors
Possibly true. The bottom line is that the peer review process is an immensely expensive undertaking reliant on a network of taxpayer-funded domain experts, which is why media *must* rely on a robust & iterative retraction mechanism.
I’m not sure this mind-reading is warranted, nor does Quillette require a defense on this point. In fact, I think the retraction is evidence of their integrity, and defense enough. But public circumspection is rarely seen in mainstream press and it’d fortify their reputation.
What I'm suggesting is precisely the opposite of anything that could be derived via mind-reading. Evidence. Behavior. I'm not sure where the disconnect is, here, but clearly it's substantial.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
